Police Stun Guns and Patrol Car Video SurveillanceStudent s NameSchoolThe spare-time activity of technology in dealing with execrables has long been debated upon . For instance , non bad(p) penalization via electric chair , gas chamber , and lethal guess is criticized for its inhuman and barbaric nature . And yet , victims of wicked fell offenses and supporters of the death penalty find capital punishment as protection to the society (Koch 1985In the same way , the procedure of law bewilder guns is viewed by those against it as supernumerary infliction of incommode and , therefore , inhuman . However curse victims insure the mapping of sandbag guns in capturing their assailants as beneficial and valuable . as well as , the use of patrol cable car surveillance has been criticized as hostility of privacy moreover individuals who yearns that the violation of their rights find justice see the use of patrol car surveillance as a valuable means to expediently suppressing the assailantsPolice Stun GunsBecause of the high crime rate in the country , many people demand succumbed to the inevitability of using constabulary dumbfound guns to protect obscure civilians from attackers as well as to taking into custody the assailants with noun phrase misuse against the latter . Stun guns use high electric potential to stop an attacker by immobilizing him simply without inflicting respectable or permanent damage (Eaton , 2007 ) Two mechanisms exit this to carry on : it confuses the sickening system by sending electric legitimate finished that system and it alike causes the muscles of the body to contract promptly qualification them do a lot of work in a short amount of time depleting their energy do them uneffective to move (Beatty , 2007Those against the use of pose guns whitethorn urge that it is unnecessary! infliction of combat injury against the suspected assailant .
However , the fact remains that criminals who attempt to flee also need to be drawd for the benefit of the victim and this can be done with minimal harm against the assailant with the use of stun guns . Thus , stun guns do not only allow the victims to have their assailants captured but the offenders are also protected in the manner that the harm that they would receive is minimal as compared to organism subjected to shootingThose against the use of stun guns would also argue that this can be greatly step , if simplely legalized . Yes , abuse may be nonplus especially with the background of police officers . In my opinion so far , it is not the mere use of stun guns that should be attacked but the wide use of it without measures that would protect the other innocent individuals to whom it may be used against . Using stun guns to pacify a criminal and preventing him to flee is necessary but using the stun guns for opprobrious purposes is not . The society will feel safer with the knowledge that their protectors , the police officers , are armed with effective means to capture the criminals about themPatrol Car Video SurveillanceThe use of patrol car pictorial matter surveillance has been attacked because of its...If you want to get a full essay, direct it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment