Models of change | Free essay | Management essays

Models of alteration Free essay Management essaysModels of ChangeThroughout the last hug drug there collapse been numerous convinces and developments in the expressive style we manage work. From the real era Frederick Winslow Taylor introduced the scientific approach, often criticized for the lack of scientific rigor and adept dimensional view of human motivation (Burnes 1989 Kelly, 1982). Rose (1988) argues, that Taylor portrays human beings as greedy robots indifferent to fatigue, boredom, loneliness and pain, and driven solely by financial incentive. However, Taylor does not ignore the fact that undivideds tolerate different abilities. He was right a federal agency to point out that not everyone was capable to work in a scientific one best way, and that individuals directed to be selected on their competency to work hard and in accordance with instruction (Linstead, Fullop Lilley, 2009).It would be upon to say that Taylorism or scientific steering is a thing of t he past, these theories are alive today. Giving strength to the French proverb The more than things change, the more they stay the same, Burkard Sievers (1995) argues that changes in the structure of work, such as Taylorism job spec / simplification, have deskilled many jobs and made work meaningless. He goes on to state, we just now need to look at McDonalds, behind the strong family image of the company, two internally and externally and the importance of team membership, is a highly Tayloristic judicature which studies have demonstrated depend on a high ratio of expendable part-time and contract labour and a punitive go for system.Taylors view was to achieve the highest productivity you had to follow one best way which was subject to rigorous control, however, Elton Mayos experiences in the Hawthorne Works Experiments disproved those beliefs.The experimenters at Hawthorne had discovered that dogma employees to become a team rather than inflicting one best way also had a s trong influence on productivity. Also the employees would have the opportunity to vary their work methods, avoiding boredom. Unlike Taylorism, the employees at Hawthorne had a dandy deal of freedom in comparison.These experiments lead us to the humanistic management approach, where changes were being implemented in consideration for the working environment for its employees with the receive to be more productive.In 1951 saw the installation of Kurt Lewins tercet footprint clay sculpture for change. This theory set out to answer the questions How does successful change happen? (Comparison of Change Theories, 2009)The key was to see that human change, whether at the individual or group level, was a profound psychological dynamic dish out that involved painful unlearning without loss of ego identity and difficult relearning as a cognitive attempt to restructure ones thoughts, perceptions, feelings and attitudes. (Change Management, 2009)Unlike previous theories which looked at h ow we approach the way we work, Lewin looked at how we implement the changes in how we work, devising the three step approach set out below.Unfreezing Changing to overcome the pressures of two individual resistance and group conformity.Movement A change member that transforms the organization from the status quo to a desired end state.Refreezing Stabilizing a change intervention by balancing driving and restraining forces.(Robbins, fig 19.3, 2009)The introduction of this new way of thinking is regarded to be the corner stone model for understanding organizational change and also the beginning of Organizational tuition (Understanding the Three Stages of Change, 2009).Our existence is defined by the fact that we have to consideration our lives to fit reality. In the sense that there are universal constants we have to make the best of, like a finite amount of resources or physical laws. Our final aim is to reach a point where we mickle shape the organisation to fit our lives. W hich begs the question if we achieve this what will we do then? This is why we have culture. To do something is not an end in itself. We need culture to reflect on how we managed to change something and how it changed us and what we need to change for the future.